Ameren - Coal - 2012 |
Coal |
Our 2012 resolution asked the company to report on the financial risks of continued reliance on coal for electricity generation.
|
|
2012 |
10.5% |
Ameren - Coal - 2013 |
Coal |
Our 2013 resolution asks for a report on the strategies and quantitative goals to reduce water use and thermal impacts on receiving waterways from the company's power generation and operations.
We negotiated a withdrawal of our shareholder resolution in exchange for Ameren's commitment to take the following actions:
Improve disclosure …
Our 2013 resolution asks for a report on the strategies and quantitative goals to reduce water use and thermal impacts on receiving waterways from the company's power generation and operations.
We negotiated a withdrawal of our shareholder resolution in exchange for Ameren's commitment to take the following actions:
Improve disclosure of water risks in the company's corporate social responsibility report based on guidelines agreed upon with As You Sow
Provide an opportunity for As You Sow to review and comment on the report before it is finalized
Complete the Carbon Disclosure Project Water Questionnaire
Tom Voss, Ameren's CEO, will discuss our work with the company on this issue in his comments at the annual shareholder meeting
More
|
|
2013 |
Withdrawn; Company will address |
Ameren Coal Resolution 2018 |
Coal |
WHEREAS: The World Economic Forum 2015 Global Risk Report ranked water as the top societal risk facing the world in terms of potential economic impact. (1) The Human Right to Water, formally recognized by the United Nations in 2010, clarifies that it is the responsibility of companies to ensure their …
WHEREAS: The World Economic Forum 2015 Global Risk Report ranked water as the top societal risk facing the world in terms of potential economic impact. (1) The Human Right to Water, formally recognized by the United Nations in 2010, clarifies that it is the responsibility of companies to ensure their operations do not infringe upon the right of individuals to sufficient, safe, acceptable, accessible, and affordable water. This human right is further buttressed by the UN’s Sustainable Development Goal 6, which includes a target for improving water quality by reducing pollution and minimizing the discharge of hazardous chemicals and materials.
More
|
|
2018 |
Pending |
Ameren-Coal-2017 |
Coal |
BE IT RESOLVED: Shareholders request that the Board prepare a complete report on the company’s efforts, above and beyond current compliance, to identify and reduce environmental and health hazards associated with past, present and future handling of coal combustion residuals, and how those efforts may reduce legal, reputational and financial …
BE IT RESOLVED: Shareholders request that the Board prepare a complete report on the company’s efforts, above and beyond current compliance, to identify and reduce environmental and health hazards associated with past, present and future handling of coal combustion residuals, and how those efforts may reduce legal, reputational and financial risks to the company. This report should be available to shareholders within 6 months of the 2017 annual meeting, be prepared at reasonable cost, and omit confidential information such as proprietary data or legal strategy.
More
|
|
2017 |
46.4% |
Consumers Energy - Coal - 2010 |
Coal |
Coal combustion waste (CCW) is a by-product of burning coal that contains high concentrations of arsenic, mercury, heavy metals and other toxins filtered out of smokestacks by pollution control equipment. CCW is often stored in landfills, impoundment ponds or abandoned mines. Over 130 million tons of CCW are generated each …
Coal combustion waste (CCW) is a by-product of burning coal that contains high concentrations of arsenic, mercury, heavy metals and other toxins filtered out of smokestacks by pollution control equipment. CCW is often stored in landfills, impoundment ponds or abandoned mines. Over 130 million tons of CCW are generated each year in the U.S.
Shareholders request that the Board prepare a report on the company’s efforts, above and beyond current compliance, to reduce environmental and health hazards associated with coal combustion waste, and how those efforts may reduce legal, reputational and other risks to the company’s finances and operations. This report should be available to shareholders by August 2010, be prepared at reasonable cost, and omit confidential information such as proprietary data or legal
strategy.
More
|
|
2010 |
43.0% |
Consumers Energy - Coal - 2011 |
Coal |
Shareholder Proposal on the Financial Risks of Reliance on Coal
|
|
2011 |
06.6% |
Dominion - Coal - 2011 |
Coal |
As You Sow asked Dominion to report on the financial risks related to their reliance on coal.
|
|
2011 |
06.7% |
Duke Energy - Coal - 2011 |
Coal |
Shareowners request that Duke Energy’s Board of Directors, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, issue a report by November 2011 on the financial risks of continued reliance on coal contrasted with increased investments in efficiency and cleaner energy, including an assessment of the cumulative costs of environmental compliance for coal plants compared …
Shareowners request that Duke Energy’s Board of Directors, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, issue a report by November 2011 on the financial risks of continued reliance on coal contrasted with increased investments in efficiency and cleaner energy, including an assessment of the cumulative costs of environmental compliance for coal plants compared to alternative generating sources.
More
|
|
2011 |
08.5% |
Duke Energy - Coal - 2012 |
Coal |
Share owners request that the Duke Board of Directors report to shareholders by November 2012, a treasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, on plans to reduce our company’s exposure to coal‐related costs and risks, including progress toward achieving specific goals to minimize commodity risks, emissions other than greenhouse gases, costs …
Share owners request that the Duke Board of Directors report to shareholders by November 2012, a treasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, on plans to reduce our company’s exposure to coal‐related costs and risks, including progress toward achieving specific goals to minimize commodity risks, emissions other than greenhouse gases, costs of environmental compliance, and construction risks.
More
|
|
2012 |
12.0% |
Duke Energy Coal Resolution 2018 |
Coal |
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that Duke Energy publish a report assessing the public health impacts of its coal use on rates of illness, mortality, and infant death, due to coal related air and water pollution in communities adjacent to Duke’s coal operations, and provide a financial analysis of the cost to …
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that Duke Energy publish a report assessing the public health impacts of its coal use on rates of illness, mortality, and infant death, due to coal related air and water pollution in communities adjacent to Duke’s coal operations, and provide a financial analysis of the cost to the Company of coal-related public health harms, including potential liability and reputational damage. The report should be published by 2019, at reasonable expense, and omit proprietary information.
More
|
|
2018 |
Pending |
Duke-Coal-Public-Health-2017 |
Coal |
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that Duke Energy publish a report assessing the public health impacts of its coal use on rates of illness, mortality, and infant death, due to coal related air and water pollution in communities adjacent to Duke’s coal operations, and provide a financial analysis of the cost to …
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that Duke Energy publish a report assessing the public health impacts of its coal use on rates of illness, mortality, and infant death, due to coal related air and water pollution in communities adjacent to Duke’s coal operations, and provide a financial analysis of the cost to the Company of coal-related public health harms, including potential liability and reputational damage. The report should be published by 2018, at reasonable expense, and omit proprietary information.
More
|
|
2017 |
27.1% |
Entergy - Coal - 2011 |
Coal |
Shareowners request that Entergy’s Board of Directors, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, issue a report by November 2011 on the financial risks of continued reliance on coal contrasted with increased investments in efficiency and cleaner energy, including assessment of the cumulative costs of environmental compliance for coal plants compared to alternative generating …
Shareowners request that Entergy’s Board of Directors, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, issue a report by November 2011 on the financial risks of continued reliance on coal contrasted with increased investments in efficiency and cleaner energy, including assessment of the cumulative costs of environmental compliance for coal plants compared to alternative generating sources.
More
|
|
2011 |
Withdrawn; Company will address |
Entergy - Coal - 2014 |
Coal |
Shareholders request that the Entergy Corporation prepare a report, reviewed by a board committee of independent directors, on policies the company could adopt to take additional near-term actions to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions consistent with the national goal of 80% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. The report …
Shareholders request that the Entergy Corporation prepare a report, reviewed by a board committee of independent directors, on policies the company could adopt to take additional near-term actions to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions consistent with the national goal of 80% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. The report should be published by October 1, 2014 at a reasonable cost and omit proprietary information.
More
|
|
2014 |
Blocked by Company at SEC |
FirstEnergy - Coal - 2011 |
Coal |
Resolved: Shareowners request that FirstEnergy’s Board of Directors, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, issue a report by November 2011 on the financial risks of continued reliance on coal contrasted with increased investments in efficiency and cleaner energy, including assessment of the cumulative costs of environmental compliance for coal …
Resolved: Shareowners request that FirstEnergy’s Board of Directors, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, issue a report by November 2011 on the financial risks of continued reliance on coal contrasted with increased investments in efficiency and cleaner energy, including assessment of the cumulative costs of environmental compliance for coal plants compared to alternative generating sources.
More
|
|
2011 |
31.4% |
FirstEnergy - Coal - 2013 |
Coal |
Shareowners request that FirstEnergy adopt strategies and quantitative goals to reduce the company’s impacts on, and risks to, water quantity and quality, above and beyond regulatory compliance, and to report to shareholders by September 2013 on progress. Such a report should omit proprietary information and be prepared at reasonable cost.
|
|
2013 |
Blocked by Company at SEC |
FirstEnergy - Coal - 2014 |
Coal |
FirstEnergy, an Ohio-based energy producer, has agreed to produce a comprehensive report on the
company’s plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. As a result, a shareholder resolution co-filed by DiNapoli, Connecticut Treasurer Denise L. Nappier on behalf of the Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds, and investment group As You …
FirstEnergy, an Ohio-based energy producer, has agreed to produce a comprehensive report on the
company’s plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. As a result, a shareholder resolution co-filed by DiNapoli, Connecticut Treasurer Denise L. Nappier on behalf of the Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds, and investment group As You Sow has been withdrawn.
More
|
|
2014 |
Withdrawn; Company will address |
FirstEnergy Coal 2012 |
Coal |
Shareowners request that FirstEnergy Board of Directors report to shareholders by December 2012, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, on plans to reduce our company’s exposure to coal‐related costs and risks, including progress toward achieving specific goals to minimize commodity risks, emissions other than greenhouse gases, and costs of …
Shareowners request that FirstEnergy Board of Directors report to shareholders by December 2012, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, on plans to reduce our company’s exposure to coal‐related costs and risks, including progress toward achieving specific goals to minimize commodity risks, emissions other than greenhouse gases, and costs of environmental compliance.
More
|
|
2012 |
11.4% |
MDU Resources - Coal - 2010 |
Coal |
Coal combustion waste (CCW) is a by‐product of burning coal that contains high concentrations of arsenic, mercury, heavy metals and other toxins that pollution control equipment filters out of smokestacks. Across the country, over 130 million tons of CCW are being stored in surface waste ponds, impoundments and abandoned mines.
Shareholders …
Coal combustion waste (CCW) is a by‐product of burning coal that contains high concentrations of arsenic, mercury, heavy metals and other toxins that pollution control equipment filters out of smokestacks. Across the country, over 130 million tons of CCW are being stored in surface waste ponds, impoundments and abandoned mines.
Shareholders request that the Board prepare a report, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, on the company’s efforts, above and beyond legal compliance, to reduce environmental and health hazards associated with coal combustion waste ponds, impoundments and mines, and how those efforts reduce risks to the company’s finance and
operations.
More
|
|
2010 |
40.0% |
NRG-Carbon-Asset-Risk-2017 |
Coal |
RESOLVED: As You Sow, on behalf of NRG shareholders, requests that NRG prepare a public report, within 12 months of the Annual Meeting, describing how it will address the risk of stranded assets and coal demand reductions associated with global climate change, including analysis of long and short term financial …
RESOLVED: As You Sow, on behalf of NRG shareholders, requests that NRG prepare a public report, within 12 months of the Annual Meeting, describing how it will address the risk of stranded assets and coal demand reductions associated with global climate change, including analysis of long and short term financial risks to the company under the International Energy Agency’s 450 scenario. The report should be produced at reasonable cost and omit proprietary information.
More
|
|
2017 |
Withdrawn; Company will address |
Pinnacle-West-Political-Expenditures-2017 |
Coal |
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that Pinnacle West prepare a public report fully disclosing monetary and in-kind expenditures on political activities that cannot be deducted as an “ordinary and necessary” business expense under section 162(e) of the Internal Revenue Code because they are incurred in connection with: (a) influencing legislation, (b) participating …
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that Pinnacle West prepare a public report fully disclosing monetary and in-kind expenditures on political activities that cannot be deducted as an “ordinary and necessary” business expense under section 162(e) of the Internal Revenue Code because they are incurred in connection with: (a) influencing legislation, (b) participating or intervening in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office, and (c) attempting to influence the general public, or segments thereof, with respect to elections, legislative matters, or referenda. Shareholders request that the report detail any:
contributions to, or expenditures in support of or in opposition to, political candidates, committees, and parties;
dues, contributions, or other payments made to tax-exempt organizations operating under sections 501(c)(3), 501(c)(4), and 527 of the Internal Revenue Code, respectively, including tax-exempt entities that write model legislation, and non-profit groups organized to promote “social welfare”;
portion of dues or other payments made to tax-exempt entities that are used for an expenditure or contribution and that would not be deductible under section 162(e) of the Code if made directly by the Company.
The report should identify all recipients of Company funds, and amounts paid to each.
More
|
|
2017 |
Withdrawn; Company will address |
PSEG - Coal - 2011 |
Coal |
Electric utility companies that rely on coal face challenges and uncertainties regarding environmental compliance costs, coal price‐volatility, and the cost of carbon capture and storage. This unprecedented combination of forces has led utility companies such as Progress, Duke and Xcel to announce coal plant retirements.
|
|
2011 |
Withdrawn; Company will address |
Southern Company - Coal - 2014 |
Coal |
Shareholders request that the Southern Company prepare a report, reviewed by a board committee of independent directors, on policies the company could adopt to take additional near-term actions to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions consistent with the national goal of 80% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. The report …
Shareholders request that the Southern Company prepare a report, reviewed by a board committee of independent directors, on policies the company could adopt to take additional near-term actions to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions consistent with the national goal of 80% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. The report should be published by October 1, 2014 at a reasonable cost and omit proprietary information.
More
|
|
2014 |
Withdrawn; Company will address |
Xcel Energy - Coal - 2011 |
Coal |
Electric utility companies that rely on coal face numerous challenges and uncertainty regarding environmental compliance costs, coal price‐volatility, and the cost of carbon capture and storage for coal plants. Industry analysts (Bernstein Research, Jeffries & Company, Standard & Poor’s, Wood Mackenzie) have concluded that the cost of additional environmental control …
Electric utility companies that rely on coal face numerous challenges and uncertainty regarding environmental compliance costs, coal price‐volatility, and the cost of carbon capture and storage for coal plants. Industry analysts (Bernstein Research, Jeffries & Company, Standard & Poor’s, Wood Mackenzie) have concluded that the cost of additional environmental control equipment for nitrous oxides (NOx), particulates and mercury may make it uneconomic to retrofit small, older coal plants. This unprecedented combination of forces has led Xcel and other utility companies such as Progress, Duke and others to announce retirements of over 30 coal plants by 2019.
More
|
|
2011 |
Withdrawn; Company will address |